Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Matthew Howell v. NCCU
as 17-1798
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW HOWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
NORTH CAROLINA CENTRAL UNIVERSITY, DEBRA SAUNDERS-WHITE, GREG MARROW and others
Defendant:
BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA, ROGER DANIELS, HARRY MONDS and others
Clementina Ibe v. Jackson Street Entertainment
as 15-1686
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLEMENTINA IBE, as personal representative of the Estate of Scharlene Alugbuo
Plaintiff:
LAURA MCFEELEY, a/k/a Dynasty, On Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly situated, DANIELLE EVERETT, a/k/a Jasmine, CRYSTAL NELSON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JACKSON STREET ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, d/b/a Fuego Exotic Dance Club, d/b/a Club Extasy Exotic Dance Club, RISQUE, LLC, d/b/a Fuego Exotic Dance Club, QUANTUM ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, LLC, d/b/a Fuego Exotic Dance Club and others
Laura McFeeley v. Jackson Street Entertainment
as 15-1583
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LAURA MCFEELEY, a/k/a Dynasty, On Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly situated, DANIELLE EVERETT, a/k/a Jasmine, CRYSTAL NELSON and others
Plaintiff:
EBONY WASHINGTON, FERRIS PACE, SHANIEKA DANIELS and others
Defendant - Appellant:
JACKSON STREET ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, d/b/a Fuego Exotic Dance Club, d/b/a Club Extasy Exotic Dance Club, RISQUE, LLC, d/b/a Fuego Exotic Dance Club, QUANTUM ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, LLC, d/b/a Fuego Exotic Dance Club and others
James Howell v. Truck Drivers and Helpers Loca
as 08-1548
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES H. HOWELL, ROBERT S. MARSHALL, GLENROY SCHISSLER and others
Plaintiff:
JACK RUSHING
Defendant - Appellee:
TRUCK DRIVERS AND HELPERS LOCAL UNION NO. 355, DRIVERS, CHAUFFEURS AND HELPERS LOCAL UNION NO. 639, TEAMSTERS 639 EMPLOYERS PENSION TRUST FUND and others
Defendant - None:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, TEAMSTERS JOINT COUNCIL NO. 55 and UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INCORPORATED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
