Cases 11 - 16 of 16
Isaac Potter, Jr. v. Michelle Lee
as 15-1670
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ISAAC A. POTTER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHELLE K. LEE, JENNIFER KRISP, ROBERTA A. BREN and others
J. Cooper v. Michelle Lee
as 15-1205
Plaintiff - Appellant:
J. CARL COOPER and ECHARGE LICENSING, LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHELLE K. LEE, in her capacity as Deputy Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and UNITED STATES PATENT & TRADEMARK OFFICE
Amicus Curiae:
AFFINITY LABS OF TEXAS, LLC
Autodesk, Inc. v. Michelle Lee
as 14-2402
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AUTODESK
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHELLE K. LEE, in her official capacity as Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Deputy Director of the United States Patent Trademark Office
Defendant:
MARGARET A. FOCARINO, in her capacity as Acting Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and UNITED STATES PATENT & TRADEMARK OFFICE
Dominion Dealer Solutions, LLC v. Michelle Lee
as 14-1597
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOMINION DEALER SOLUTIONS, LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHELLE K. LEE, Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Deputy Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Hossein Mohsenzadeh v. Teresa Rea
as 14-1489
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOSSEIN MOHSENZADEH
Defendant - Appellee:
TERESA STANEK REA, Hon.; Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and MICHELLE K. LEE, Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Deputy Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Isaac Potter, Jr. v. Roberta Bren
as 14-1445
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ISAAC A. POTTER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERTA SUE BREN, OBLON SPIVAK, MICHELLE K. LEE, Deputy Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and others
Defendant:
TERESA STANEK REA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
