Cases 21 - 30 of 88
Daniel Hill v. USPS
as 19-2014
Petitioner / Appellant:
DANIEL C. HILL
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
NLRB v. USPS
as 19-1970
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
John Rooks v. USPS
as 19-1563
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN FITZGERALD ROOKS
Kenneth Smith v. Megan Brennan
as 19-1293
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Post Master General, United States Postal Service Agency
Bruce Phillips, Jr. v. Bruce Phillips, Sr.
as 18-1169
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRUCE E. PHILLIPS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
BRUCE EDWARD PHILLIPS, SR., Double Confidential Informant for FBI & DHS, WILAIWAN MCKINNY, DEA, EDWIN MCGEE, Secret Service and others
Tonya Chapman v. Greenville SC USPS
as 17-1717
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONYA R. CHAPMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
GREENVILLE SC UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, JENNIFER ALDRICH, Asst US Atty Dep Chief Civil Div and ANN E. MANDERNACH
NLRB v. USPS
as 16-1784
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Carl Washington, Jr. v. National Reconnaissance Office
as 16-1785
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARL THURSTON WASHINGTON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE (NRO), FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, BERKELEY COUNTY, WV and others
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES (DCJS), UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL and others
NLRB v. USPS
as 16-1611
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Priscilla Pelzer v. Megan Brennan
as 16-1160
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PRISCILLA PELZER
Defendant - Appellee:
MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Postmaster General, United States Postal Services, Agency. Capitol Metro Area
Defendant:
JANICE SANDERLIN, SHARON PETERS and PAULA ARMATIS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
