Cases 31 - 40 of 172
NLRB v. WF Coal Sales, Inc.
as 19-1472
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
WF COAL SALES, INC., A successor to Cobalt Coal LTD. and its subsidiaries
NLRB v. Cobalt Coal Corp. Mining, Inc.
as 19-1285
Petitioner / Appellant:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
COBALT COAL CORP. MINING, INC
NLRB v. Anthony and Associates, Inc.
as 17-2307
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
ANTHONY AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
NLRB v. Butler Medical Transport, LLC
as 17-1984
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
BUTLER MEDICAL TRANSPORT, LLC
Butler Medical Transport, LLC v. NLRB
as 17-1896
Petitioner:
BUTLER MEDICAL TRANSPORT, LLC
Respondent:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
NLRB v. USPOA
as 17-1022
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
UNITED SECURITY & POLICE OFFICERS OF AMERICA
:
NLRB v. Potomac Disposal, Inc.
as 17-1023
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
POTOMAC DISPOSAL, INC.
Lisa Henderson v. Greenbrier VMC, LLC
as 16-2332
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LISA Y. HENDERSON, Acting Regional Director of the Tenth Region of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board and NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Defendant - Appellee:
GREENBRIER VMC, LLC, doing business as Greenbrier Valley Medical Center
Lisa Henderson v. Bluefield Hospital Co., LLC
as 16-2331
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LISA Y. HENDERSON, Acting Regional Director of the Tenth Region of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board and NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Defendant - Appellee:
BLUEFIELD HOSPITAL CO., LLC, d/b/a Bluefield Regional Medical Center
NLRB v. S. Freedman & Sons, Inc.
as 16-2270
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
S. FREEDMAN & SONS, INC.
Intervenor:
DRIVERS, CHAUFFEURS AND HELPERS LOCAL UNION NO. 639
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
