Cases 31 - 40 of 144
William Hayes v. John Whitley
as 22-1062
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM T. HAYES
Plaintiff:
ROY L. PERRY-BEY, PHILLIP WEBSTER, GEORGE BOWE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN E. WHITLEY, THOMAS B. MODLY, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the Navy, DENIS R. MCDONOUGH and others
US v. Marcus McMillan
as 21-4608
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARCUS NEAL MCMILLAN
Kindall Neale v. Lawrence Hogan
as 21-7287
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KINDALL NEALE
Defendant / Appellee:
LAWRENCE J. HOGAN, Governor of Maryland, BOYD K. RUTHERFORD, Lieutenant Governor, ROBERT L. GREEN, Secretary of Public Safety and others
Roy Perry-Bey v. U.S. Department of Defense
as 21-1604
Plaintiff:
GEORGE BOWE, and all others similarly situated, MARY E. HILL, and all others similarly situated, WILLIAM T. HAYES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROY L. PERRY-BEY, and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
LLOYD AUSTIN, DENIS R. MCDONOUGH, THOMAS B. MODLY, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the Navy and others
Charles Anderson v. Quality Correctional Health Care
as 21-6455
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES SPENCER ANDERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER MILLER, QUALITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE, LIEUTENANT SWEAT and others
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT NEAL and SUMTER LEE REGIONAL DETENTION CENTER
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOHNSON
Olivia Neal v. East Carolina University
as 20-2153
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OLIVIA NEAL
Defendant / Appellee:
EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY
Quinton Neal v. CP&O and Ports America
as 20-2113
Respondent:
CP&O, LLC, DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and PORTS AMERICA
Petitioner:
QUINTON A. NEAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 20-1828
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
