Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Cases 41 - 50 of 162
Yeison Ortiz v. Chad Wolf We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-7028
Respondent / Appellee: CHAD WOLF, Acting Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, FRANCISCO MADRIGAL, Baltimore Field Office Director, JACK KAVANAGH, Director of Howard County Detention Center and others
Petitioner / Appellant: YEISON LEON ORTIZ
Joshua M. v. William Barr
as 20-6642
Petitioner: JOSHUA M.
Respondent: CHAD F. WOLF, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary for the United States Department of Homeland Security, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary for the United States Department of Homeland Security, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, in his capacity as Purported Acting Director for the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Howard Duncan v. Jack Kavanagh
as 20-6501
Respondent: DIANE WITTE, in her official capacity as Field Office Director, Maryland Field Office, Immigrations and Customs Enforcement, JACK KAVANAGH, in his official capacity as Director, Howard County Detention Center, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, in his official capacity as Acting Director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner: HOWARD EGBA DUNCAN
Howard Duncan v. Jack Kavanagh
as 20-6502
Respondent / Appellee: DIANE WITTE, in her official capacity as Field Office Director, Maryland Field Office, Immigrations and Customs Enforcement, WILLIAM P. BARR, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, JACK KAVANAGH, in his official capacity as Director, Howard County Detention Center and others
Petitioner / Appellant: HOWARD EGBA DUNCAN
Raymond Aigbekaen v. Chad Wolf
as 20-6407
Plaintiff / Appellant: RAYMOND IDEMUDIA AIGBEKAEN
Defendant / Appellee: KELLY BAIRD, Special Agent, Homeland Security Investigation, in her official capacity, CHAD WOLF, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and MARK A. MORGAN, Director of CBP, in his official capacity
Guilford College v. Chad Wolf
as 20-1392
Defendant / Appellant: L. FRANCIS CISSNA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, CHAD F. WOLF, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: THE NEW SCHOOL, SEN LI, GUILFORD COLLEGE and others
Saadiq Long v. William Barr
as 20-1406
Petitioner: LESHAUNA DAVES, JUANGJAN DAVES and SAADIQ LONG, a/k/a Paul Anderson
Respondent: CHRISTOPHER ASHER WRAY, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, in his official capacity, only, CHARLES H. KABLE, IV, Director of the Terrorism Screening Center, in his official capactiy, only, KIRSTJEN M. NIELSON, Secretary of Homeland Security, United States Department of Homeland Security, in her official capacity, only; and others
Anas Elhady v. Charles Kable We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1119
Plaintiff / Appellee: SAMIR ANWAR, WAEL HAKMEH, MURAT FRLJUCKIE and others
Defendant / Appellant: KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, Acting Commissioner of United States Customs and Border Protection in his official capacity, CHARLES H. KABLE, IV, Director of the Terrorist Screening Center, in his official capacity, NICHOLAS J. RASMUSSEN, Director of the National Counterterrorism Center in his official capacity and others
Charles Kable, IV v. Anas Elhady
as 20-154
Respondent: MICHAEL EDMUND COLEMAN, MUHAMMAD YAHYA KHAN, JOHN DOE, No. 4 and others
Petitioner: CHARLES H. KABLE, IV, Director of the Terrorist Screening Center, in his official capacity, NICHOLAS J. RASMUSSEN, Director of the National Counterterrorism Center in his official capacity, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, Acting Commissioner of United States Customs and Border Protection in his official capacity and others
Mohammad Salami v. US DHS Office
as 20-6175
Defendant / Appellee: NORTH CAROLINA SECRETARY OF STATE, GREENSBORO DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, GUILFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, Sheriff's Office and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: MOHAMMAD REZA SALAMI, PH.D, M.D.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?