Cases 41 - 50 of 230
US v. Daniel King
as 22-6087
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DANIEL LLOYD AVERY KING
US v. Lloyd Adams
as 22-6009
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
LLOYD OBED ADAMS
Justin Adkins v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
as 21-2051
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUSTIN ADKINS, JUSTIN BLAKE, EDWIN GLOWACKI and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INCORPORATED, CRAIG S. HELIGMAN, M.D., GUS THOELE and others
Defendant:
CSX CORPORATION and DILLON DOUG JONES
James Hobgood v. Timothy Brooks
as 21-1641
Defendant / Appellee:
DENIS DEAN, GERALD FAULKNER and TIMOTHY LLOYD BROOKS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES DANIEL HOBGOOD
James Hobgood v. Timothy Brooks
as 21-1640
Defendant / Appellee:
ERIN L. WIEDEMANN, TIMOTHY LLOYD BROOKS, GERALD FAULKNER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES DANIEL HOBGOOD
Roy Perry-Bey v. U.S. Department of Defense
as 21-1604
Plaintiff:
GEORGE BOWE, and all others similarly situated, MARY E. HILL, and all others similarly situated, WILLIAM T. HAYES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROY L. PERRY-BEY, and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
LLOYD AUSTIN, DENIS R. MCDONOUGH, THOMAS B. MODLY, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the Navy and others
US v. Lloyd Royal, III
as 21-6481
Defendant / Appellant:
LLOYD MACK ROYAL, III, a/k/a Blyss, a/k/a B, a/k/a Furious
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Calvin Taylor v. Sheriff Wayne Coats
as 21-6596
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CALVIN LLOYD TAYLOR
Defendant / Appellee:
SHERIFF WAYNE COATS, MAJOR MCNEIL, CAPTAIN GRADY and others
US v. Peter Coley
as 21-6792
Defendant / Appellant:
PETER LLOYD COLEY, a/k/a Fred Coley, a/k/a Fred, a/k/a Fredyo, a/k/a Kenny Randell, a/k/a Mipindazi Maku Ujimi, a/k/a Will Johnson
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
