Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Harry Pennington, III v. Fluor Enterprises, Inc.
as 21-1141
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HARRY PENNINGTON, III, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and TIMOTHY LORENTZ, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
FLUOR ENTERPRISES, INC., FLUOR DANIEL MAINTENANCE SERVICES, INC., FLUOR CORPORATION and others
In re: SCANA Corporation
as 20-1954
Not Classified By Court:
In re: SCANA CORPORATION PUBLIC SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION
Appellant:
SCANA CORPORATION
Defendant:
SHARON A. DECKER, LYNNE M. MILLER, GREGORY E. ALIFF and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
METZLER ASSET MANAGEMENT GMBH, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated and CITY OF WARREN POLICE AND FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
W. Leighton Lord, III v. South Carolina Electric & Gas
as 20-1346
Plaintiff / Appellee:
W. LEIGHTON LORD, III, in his capacity as chairman and director of the South Carolina Public Service Authority, JESSICA S. COOK, DONNA JENKINS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY, a/k/a Santee Cooper, an agency of the state of South Carolina
Defendant / Appellant:
SCANA SERVICES, INCORPORATED, SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS COMPANY and SCANA CORPORATION
South Carolina Electric & Gas v. South Carolina Public Service
as 20-134
Respondent:
CORRIN F. BOWERS, KRISTOFER CLARK, in his capacity as director of the South Carolina Public Service Authority, PEGGY H. PINNELL, in her capacity as director of the South Carolina Public Service Authority and others
Petitioner:
SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS COMPANY, SCANA SERVICES, INCORPORATED and SCANA CORPORATION
Joseph Edward Wojcicki v. SCANA/SCE&G
as 17-2045
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH WOJCICKI
Defendant - Appellee:
SCANA CORPORATION and SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
