Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Ohio Valley Environmental Coal v. United States Army Corp We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-2129
Plaintiff - Appellant: OHIO VALLEY ENVIRONMENTAL COALITION, WEST VIRGINIA HIGHLANDS CONSERVANCY, INCORPORATED, SIERRA CLUB and others
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, THOMAS P. BOSTICK, Commander and Chief of Engineers, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers and STEVEN MCGUGAN, Colonel, District Engineer, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Huntington District
Intervenor/Defendant: RAVEN CREST CONTRACTING, LLC
South Carolina Coastal v. United States Army Corp We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-1796
Plaintiff - Appellant: SOUTH CAROLINA COASTAL CONSERVATION LEAGUE
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, Charleston District, SA JOHN M. MCHUGH, in his official capacity as the Secretary of the US Army, LTG THOMAS P. BOSTICK, in his official capacity as Chief of Engineers and others
Preservation Society v. United States Army Corp
as 13-2401
Plaintiff - Appellee: PRESERVATION SOCIETY OF CHARLESTON and SOUTH CAROLINA COASTAL CONSERVATION LEAGUE
Defendant - Appellant: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, JOHN M. MCHUGH, In his Official Capacity as the Secretary of the U.S. Army and THOMAS P. BOSTICK, In his Official Capacity as Chief of Engineers
Intervenor/Defendant: SOUTH CAROLINA PORTS AUTHORITY
Preservation Society v. South Carolina Ports Authority
as 13-2280
Plaintiff - Appellee: PRESERVATION SOCIETY OF CHARLESTON and SOUTH CAROLINA COASTAL CONSERVATION LEAGUE
Defendant: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, JOHN M. MCHUGH, In his Official Capacity as the Secretary of the U.S. Army and THOMAS P. BOSTICK, In his Official Capacity as Chief of Engineers
Intervenor/Defendant - Appellant: SOUTH CAROLINA PORTS AUTHORITY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?