Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Robert White v. EPA
as 24-1635
Plaintiff:
ROBERT D. WHITE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, MICHAEL S. REGAN, in his official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency and others
Intervenor:
NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION and NORTH CAROLINA WILDLIFE FEDERATION
Leebcor Services, LLC v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
as 23-1814
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEEBCOR SERVICES, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, USA, CHRISTINE WORMUTH, Secretary of the Army, in her official capacity, SCOTT A. SPELLMON, Lieutenant General, U.S. Army Chief of Engineers, in his official capacity and others
Cape Fear River Watch v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
as 22-2223
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CAPE FEAR RIVER WATCH, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE and NORTH CAROLINA WILDLIFE FEDERATION
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and BENJAMIN A. BENNETT, Colonel, in his official capacity as U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District Commander
Paul Mashni v. US Army Corps of Engineers
as 21-1484
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL EDWARD MASHNI, KIAWAH RIVER FARMS LLC and KRF XSL LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and LIEUTENANT COLONEL RACHEL HONDERD
South Carolina, State of v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
as 21-1085
Defendant / Appellant:
MAJOR GENERAL DIANA M. HOLLAND, in her official capacity as Commanding General, South Atlantic Division, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS SAVANNAH DISTRICT, RYAN D. MCCARTHY, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Army and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
SAVANNAH RIVERKEEPER
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, AUGUSTA, GEORGIA, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL and others
Sierra Club v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
as 20-2042
Petitioner:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, WILD VIRGINIA, APPALACHIAN VOICES and others
Respondent:
COLONEL PATRICK V. KINSMAN, in his official capacity as District Commander of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Norfolk District, LIEUTENANT GENERAL SCOTT A. SPELLMON, in his official capacity as U.S. Army Chief of Engineers and Commanding General of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, WILLIAM T. WALKER, in his official capacity as Chief, Regulatory Branch, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Norfolk District and others
Sierra Club v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
as 20-2039
Petitioner:
INDIAN CREEK WATERSHED ASSOCIATION, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, APPALACHIAN VOICES and others
Respondent:
COLONEL JASON A. EVERS, in his official capacity as District Commander of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Huntington District, LIEUTENANT GENERAL SCOTT A. SPELLMON, in his official capacity as U.S. Army Chief of Engineers and Commanding General of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and others
Anthony Bryant v. US Army Corps of Engineers
as 20-1697
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLESTON DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, CITY OF CHARLESTON, CHAIRMAN OF PUBLIC SAFETY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY G. BRYANT
Anthony Bryant v. US Army Corps of Engineers
as 20-1698
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CHARLESTON and UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY G. BRYANT
Friends of the Capital C.T. v. United States Army Corps
as 20-1544
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEONARD SCENSNY, JOHN MACKNIGHT FITZGERALD and FRIENDS OF THE CAPITAL CRESCENT TRAIL
Defendant / Appellee:
CHIEF JOSEPH P. DAVIA, Chief, Maryland Section, Northern United States Army Corps of Engineers, COL. JOHN T. LITZ, Commander and District Engineer United States Army Corps of Engineers and UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
