Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Roberson v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 3:2020cv00485
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated, McKesson Corporation, Does 1 through 100, inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
Steve Roberson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 5:2020cv00137
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated, McKesson Corporation, Does 1 through 100, inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
Patricia Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dominy v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 3:2020cv00468
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated, McKesson Corporation, Does 1 through 100, inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Dominy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hill v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00454
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc., McKesson Corporation, Does 1 through 100, inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
Shirley Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Drake et al v. Mentor Worldwide LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00065
Plaintiff:
Melissa Gassaway, Aracely Parra, Teresa Drake and others
Defendant:
Analytic Biosurgical Solutions, Mentor Worldwide LLC, Coloplast Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mahan et al v. American Security Mortgage Corporation et al
as 5:2014cv00176
Plaintiff:
Lindsay H. Mahan and Brandon Holland
Defendant:
American Security Mortgage Corporation , Federal National Mortgage Association , Fannie Mae and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Wadham v. Shire U.S., Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00159
Plaintiff:
Mary Kathleen Wadham
Defendant:
Shire U.S., Inc., Shire, LLC and Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Coach, Inc. et al v. Dillie Lou's et al
as 1:2011cv00149
Plaintiff:
Coach, Inc. and Coach Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Dillie Lou's, Delia James and Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.