Cases 71 - 80 of 660
Bridge v. Astrue
as 5:2012cv00096
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Stacy G. Bridge
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Faulkner v. Astrue
as 7:2012cv00426
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Rickey Leonard Faulkner
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jakupczyk v. Astrue
as 7:2012cv00405
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Lynn Jakupczyk
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Propst v. Astrue
as 5:2012cv00089
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested Party:
U.S. Attorney Timothy J. Heaphy, US Atty Gen Eric H. Holder, Jr. and SSA General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Angela S. Propst
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Newman v. Astrue
as 5:2012cv00088
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Newman
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Pence v. Astrue
as 7:2012cv00402
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Teresa Pence
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rosina v. Astrue
as 7:2012cv00399
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lewis Rosina, Jr.
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Carter v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv00023
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Lauren Ashley Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Simpkins v. Astrue
as 5:2012cv00086
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Bishop Simpkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
May v. Astrue
as 5:2012cv00083
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Nancy May
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
