Real Property Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Virginia
Cases 51 - 60 of 605
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 0.73 Acres of Land, Owned by Jerry Robertson Davis, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
as 4:2022cv00075
Plaintiff: Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant: 0.73 Acres of Land, Owned by Jerry Robertson Davis, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 9.77 Acres of Land, Owned by Albert L. Keatts and Ocie Adams Keatts, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
as 4:2022cv00065
Plaintiff: Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant: 9.77 Acres of Land, Owned by Albert L. Keatts and Ocie Adams Keatts, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 1.77 Acres of Land, Owned by Malcolm Dale Roach, Jr., Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
as 4:2022cv00043
Plaintiff: Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant: 1.77 Acres of Land, Owned by Malcolm Dale Roach, Jr., Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 11.86 Acres of Land, Owned by Donald B. Barnhart
as 7:2022cv00320
Plaintiff: Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant: 11.86 Acres of Land, Owned by Donald B. Barnhart
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 0.11 Acres of Land, Owned by Carlton Vaden Morton and Betty Brown Morton, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
as 4:2022cv00036
Plaintiff: Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant: 0.11 Acres of Land, Owned by Carlton Vaden Morton and Betty Brown Morton, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 6.72 Acres of Land, Owned by Phillip W. Hutson, Sr. and Susan H. Hutson, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00088
Plaintiff: Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant: 6.72 Acres of Land, Owned by Phillip W. Hutson, Sr. and Susan H. Hutson, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC and 3.32 Acres of Land, Owned by Phillip W. Hutson, Sr. and Susan H. Hutson, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 4.32 Acres of Land, Owned by Kenneth L. Hudson and Patricia A. Hudson, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
as 4:2022cv00064
Plaintiff: Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant: 4.32 Acres of Land, Owned by Kenneth L. Hudson and Patricia A. Hudson, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 0.24 Acres of Land, Owned by Tartle, LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2022cv00315
Plaintiff: Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant: 0.24 Acres of Land, Owned by Tartle, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 2.36 Acres of Land, Owned by Jo Ann Parrish Atkinson, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
as 4:2022cv00076
Plaintiff: Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant: 2.36 Acres of Land, Owned by Jo Ann Parrish Atkinson, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 2.19 Acres of Land, Owned By Stephen D. Legge, David Legge, and Phyllis J. Legge
as 7:2022cv00312
Plaintiff: Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant: 2.19 Acres of Land, Owned By Stephen D. Legge, David Legge, and Phyllis J. Legge
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?