Cases 71 - 80 of 2,135
Artis v. Armstrong
as 3:2023cv06181
Plaintiff:
Roslyn Clark Artis
Defendant:
Megan E. Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
E Solutions Consulting Inc v. R&L Carriers Inc
as 7:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
E Solutions Consulting Inc
Defendant:
R&L Carriers Inc and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Caldwell v. U.S. Postal Service
as 0:2023cv06251
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Caldwell
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Holder v. Cross et al
as 7:2023cv06315
Plaintiff:
Wayne A Holder
Defendant:
Robert D Cross and Big G Express, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Harney et al v. Little Logging Inc et al
as 4:2023cv06546
Plaintiff:
Selby E Harney and Pamela Harney
Defendant:
Little Logging Inc and Michael D Little
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Butler v. Fenstermacher
as 1:2023cv05976
Plaintiff:
Nashawn Butler
Defendant:
Lucy Fenstermacher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Lavender v. Fritziam et al
as 7:2023cv06000
Plaintiff:
Megan Lavender
Defendant:
Tataille Fritziam, Eva Logistics and Streamline Express
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Chauncey v. Frederick
as 3:2023cv06376
Plaintiff:
Lindsay Chauncey
Defendant:
Richard Dodge Frederick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Haven v. Virgillo et al
as 2:2023cv06196
Plaintiff:
Robert Charlie Haven
Defendant:
Michael Joseph Virgillo and NFI Interactive Logistics LLC doing business as NFI Transportation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Ramsey v. Orozco et al
as 0:2023cv06092
Defendant:
Carlos A. Orozco, Carlos A. Lopez and Bonanza Transportation, LLC
Plaintiff:
Jimmy M. Ramsey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
