Cases 1 - 10 of 202
Gregg v. Saul
as 2:2020cv00016
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul and SSA General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Ralph C. Gregg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Leonard v. Astrue
as 2:2013cv00007
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Melissa Gail Leonard
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bippus v. Astrue
as 2:2013cv00006
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lee Bippus
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Kelly v. Astrue
as 1:2013cv00009
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Kathy Lynne Kelly
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Whitt v. Astrue
as 2:2013cv00002
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Plaintiff:
David M. Whitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Crump v. Social Security
as 7:2013cv00007
Plaintiff:
Janet M. Crump
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Defendant:
Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jones v. Astrue
as 5:2013cv00002
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
John Paul Jones
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Herron v. Astrue
as 2:2013cv00001
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Johnny Herron
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Whitaker v. Astrue
as 5:2012cv00130
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Wallace H. Whitaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Williams v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv00063
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Jerry W. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
