Cases 61 - 70 of 106
Ewald v. Astrue
as 6:2010cv00047
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
Patricia S. Ewald
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Short v. Astrue
as 1:2010cv00056
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Interested Party:
General Counsel of the Social Security Administration and SSA General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Leslie S. Short
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Blevins v. Astrue
as 1:2010cv00054
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
Madelyn L Blevins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Tanner v. Astrue
as 5:2010cv00084
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Orval Dewey Tanner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ramey v. Astrue
as 7:2010cv00356
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Ramey
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Allen v. Astrue
as 6:2010cv00035
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Allen
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rasheed v. Astrue
as 7:2010cv00287
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
Gail Rasheed
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Beavers v. Astrue
as 1:2010cv00040
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
Darrell Randall Beavers
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bowyer v. Astrue
as 7:2010cv00281
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Gail Bowyer
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hale v. Astrue
as 7:2010cv00279
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
Cynthia H. Hale
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
