Cases 131 - 140 of 155
Harold Smith v. Edward Reilly, Jr.
as 08-6103
Petitioner - Appellant:
HAROLD SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
EDWARD F. REILLY, JR., Chairman for the United States Parole Commission, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director for the Federal Bureau of Prisons and ALBERTO R. GONZALES, United States Attorney General
Feng Yu v. Michael Mukasey
as 08-1070
Petitioner:
FENG PING YU
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, United States Attorney General
Mihaela Iorga v. Michael Mukasey
as 08-1015
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIHAELA IORGA
Defendant - Appellee:
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General of the United States of America, PHYLLIS HOWARD, District Director U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services, CHARLES PHILIP ROSENBERG, United States Attorney and others
Fokodjo Edoh v. Michael Mukasey
as 08-1010
Petitioner:
FOKODJO OBUBE EDOH
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, United States Attorney General
Getenet Gebre-Selassie v. Michael Mukasey
as 08-1000
Petitioner:
GETENET GEBRE-SELASSIE
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, United States Attorney General
James Bell v. US
as 08-1003
Petitioner:
JAMES DALTON BELL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Mustafa Waffi v. Michael Mukasey
as 07-2205
Petitioner:
MUSTAFA WAFFI
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, United States Attorney General
Albert Bikim v. Michael Mukasey
as 07-2190
Petitioner:
ALBERT EDEZE BIKIM
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, United States Attorney General
Henri Thoka v. Michael Mukasey
as 07-2163
Petitioner:
HENRI THOKA, THERESE DJUNKEU and I.C.P.T.
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, United States Attorney General
Desire Yeboua v. Michael Mukasey
as 07-1972
Petitioner:
DESIRE KOFFI YEBOUA
Respondent:
PETER D. KEISLER, Acting United States Attorney General and MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Acting United States Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
