Other Statutes Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 105
US v. Edward Huffman
as 22-4336
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: EDWARD NEAL HUFFMAN
US v. Kenneth Neal
as 22-6299
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: KENNETH HOWARD NEAL
US v. Kevin Smith
as 22-4125
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: KEVIN NEAL SMITH
In re: Denard Neal
as 22-1159
Petitioner: In re: DENARD DARNELL NEAL
US v. Marcus McMillan
as 21-4608
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: MARCUS NEAL MCMILLAN
Kindall Neale v. Lawrence Hogan
as 21-7287
Plaintiff / Appellant: KINDALL NEALE
Defendant / Appellee: LAWRENCE J. HOGAN, Governor of Maryland, BOYD K. RUTHERFORD, Lieutenant Governor, ROBERT L. GREEN, Secretary of Public Safety and others
In re: Susan Matousek We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-1856
Petitioner: In re: SUSAN NEAL MATOUSEK
Roy Perry-Bey v. U.S. Department of Defense We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-1604
Plaintiff: GEORGE BOWE, and all others similarly situated, MARY E. HILL, and all others similarly situated, WILLIAM T. HAYES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ROY L. PERRY-BEY, and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: LLOYD AUSTIN, DENIS R. MCDONOUGH, THOMAS B. MODLY, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the Navy and others
In re: Susan Matousek We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-1413
Petitioner: In re: SUSAN NEAL MATOUSEK
Charles Anderson v. Quality Correctional Health Care We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-6455
Plaintiff / Appellant: CHARLES SPENCER ANDERSON
Defendant / Appellee: OFFICER MILLER, QUALITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE, LIEUTENANT SWEAT and others
Defendant: LIEUTENANT NEAL and SUMTER LEE REGIONAL DETENTION CENTER
Plaintiff: MICHAEL JOHNSON

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?