Cases 41 - 50 of 278
Dontez Simuel v. Scott Harris
as 21-6097
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONTEZ LAMONT SIMUEL
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL DUGGAN, SCOTT S. HARRIS, Clerk of the U.S. Supreme Court and LAURIE WOOD
US v. Carlos Woods
as 20-7893
Defendant / Appellant:
CARLOS WOODS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hong Tang v. Kurt Schmoke
as 20-2308
Defendant / Appellee:
ROGER E. HARTLEY, Dean of the College of Public Affairs, DARLENE BRANNIGAN SMITH, Executive Vice President, KURT L. SCHMOKE, President of the University of Baltimore and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HONG TANG
US v. Rajul Ruhbayan
as 20-7710
Defendant / Appellant:
RAJUL RUHBAYAN, a/k/a Creme, a/k/a James Vernon Wood, a/k/a James Vernette Johnson, a/k/a Kreem, a/k/a Day-Ja, a/k/a Deja, a/k/a Amir Ruhbayan, a/k/a Jibra'el Ruh-alamin, a/k/a Jibrael Ruhalamin
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Teresa Speaks v. U. S. Tobacco Cooperative
as 20-2098
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERESA M. SPEAKS, ROY L. COOK, ALEX SHUGART and others
Defendant / Appellee:
U. S. TOBACCO COOPERATIVE INC., f/k/a Flue-Cured Tobacco Cooperative Stabilization Corporation
John Wood v. Bryan Stirling
as 20-11
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN R. WOOD
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIE DAVIS, Warden, Kirkland Reception and Evaluation Center, BRYAN P. STIRLING, Commissioner, South Carolina Department of Corrections and MICHAEL STEPHAN, Warden, Broad River Correctional Institution
David Meyers v. Carl Manis
as 20-7262
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER DANIELS, J. ELY, A. W. COMBS and others
Defendant:
JAMES JONES, PAMELA MEADE SARGENT, ROBERT STEWART BALLOU and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Harry James v. Roy Cooper
as 20-7214
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, CHRIS WOODS, JOSH STEIN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HARRY SHAROD JAMES
Hong Tang v. The University of Baltimore
as 20-1810
Defendant / Appellee:
DARLENE BRANNIGAN SMITH, PATRIA DE LANCER JULNES, JOSEPH S. WOOD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HONG TANG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
