Cases 51 - 60 of 656
Kewon English v. Joseph Clarke
as 21-2274
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KEWON ENGLISH and EARL POWELL
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSEPH CLARKE, LEON LOTT, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Richland County and RICHLAND COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Deandre Johnson v. Harold Clarke
as 21-7555
Petitioner / Appellant:
DEANDRE JOHNSON
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE
Shawn Echols v. Harold Clarke
as 21-7540
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAWN ECHOLS
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, Director of VADOC and CARL MANIS
Timothy Bolden v. Harold Clarke
as 21-7533
Petitioner / Appellant:
TIMOTHY BOLDEN
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Mark Lowe v. David Hamlett
as 21-7527
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK MADISON LOWE
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID HAMLETT, Chief of Security and HAROLD CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Kewon English v. Joseph Clarke
as 21-2232
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEWON ENGLISH
Plaintiff:
EARL POWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH CLARKE, LEON LOTT, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Richland County and RICHLAND COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
DeWayne Baker v. Ivan Gilmore
as 21-2227
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEWAYNE BAKER, a/k/a Dwayne Baker
Defendant / Appellee:
IVAN T. GILMORE, Warden, A. HICKS, Assistant Warden, K. H. TUCKER, Institutional Ombudsman and others
Defendant:
COFFEEWOOD CORRECTIONAL CENTER, T. HARVEY, Regional Ombudsman Central Region, MARCUS M. HODGES, Regional Administrator Central Region and others
David Frizzell v. Harold Clarke
as 21-7491
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID M. FRIZZELL
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Department of Corrections
Taurean Edwards v. Harold Clarke
as 21-7475
Petitioner / Appellant:
TAUREAN JERRELL EDWARDS
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE
Traci Guynup v. Travis Sumption
as 21-2167
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRACI M. GUYNUP
Defendant / Appellee:
CLARKE COUNTY SHERIFF CHIEF DEPUTY TRAVIS SUMPTION, in his individual capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
