Cases 61 - 70 of 284
Ibrahima Mountaga v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 08-2049
Petitioner:
IBRAHIMA MOUNTAGA
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Sebulime Cissy v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 08-2057
Petitioner:
SEBULIME NAMUBIRU CISSY
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Jia Tang v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 08-2050
Petitioner:
JIA QIANG TANG
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Caleche Bongo v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 08-2056
Petitioner:
CALECHE NJWENG BONGO
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Rifaqat Ali v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 08-2042
Petitioner:
RIFAQAT ALI
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Fu Li v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 08-2032
Petitioner:
FU LI
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, United States Department of Justice and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, United States Department of Justice
Sylvie Nyato v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 08-2026
Petitioner:
SYLVIE NYATO
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Indra Alimin v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 08-2029
Petitioner:
INDRA ALIMIN
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Department of Justice, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Department of Justice and DEBORAH ACHIM, Head, Detention and Removal, Fairfax, Virginia, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security
Xue Wei Chen v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 08-2006
Petitioner:
XUE WEI CHEN
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Richard Feng v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 08-1999
Petitioner:
RICHARD FENG
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.