Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Rosalva Pena-Cartagena v. Merrick Garland
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 22-1184
Petitioner:
ROSALVA VERONICA PENA-CARTAGENA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Sandra Hernandez-Cartagena v. William Barr
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 19-1823
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Petitioner:
SANDRA MARLENY HERNANDEZ-CARTAGENA
Jorge Amaya v. Power Design, Incorporated
as 15-1691
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY O. COREA MONTALVAN, RAUL D. AMPUDIA, MARIO ANTONIO SIGUENZA DIAZ and others
Amicus Curiae:
SECRETARY OF LABOR and ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
POWER DESIGN, INCORPORATED
US v. Amado Cartagena
as 11-6256
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
AMADO ANTONIO CARTAGENA
US v. Amado Cartagena
as 10-7583
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
AMADO ANTONIO CARTAGENA
US v. Amado Cartagena
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 09-6100
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
AMADO ANTONIO CARTAGENA
US v. Salvador Cartagena
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 07-5006
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SALVADOR ANTONIO CARTAGENA, a/k/a Salvador Antonio Cartagena-Carias
US v. Amado Cartagena
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 07-4530
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
AMADO ANTONIO CARTAGENA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.