Cases 1 - 10 of 73
US v. Conrad Smith, Jr.
as 24-6311
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CONRAD ALEX SMITH, JR.
US v. Randall Conrad
as 22-6007
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RANDALL LEE CONRAD
Daniel Parsons v. Warden Hawkins
as 21-7611
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL B. PARSONS
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN HAWKINS, CAROLINE FLEMING, CRISTEL VAUGHAN and others
Defendant:
GOVERNOR ROY COOPER, DIRECTOR TODD E. ISHEE and KIMBERLY D. GRANDE, Grievance Examiner
Conrad Burke v. J. Oates, III
as 21-6860
Defendant / Appellee:
J. SCHNUR, RN, J. DILLMAN, Health Services Director and J. D. OATES, III, Assistant Warden
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CONRAD BURKE
US v. Conrad Smith, Jr.
as 21-6632
Defendant / Appellant:
CONRAD ALEX SMITH, JR.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Lance Pagan v. FBI
as 20-7619
Defendant / Appellee:
RENAE ALT SUMMERS, Defense Attorney for Guiese Law Firm, ROBERT J. CONRAD, JR., Judge, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LANCE RICHARDSON PAGAN
US v. Randall Conrad
as 20-7581
Defendant / Appellant:
RANDALL LEE CONRAD
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
John Baccus v. State of South Carolina
as 20-7565
Defendant / Appellee:
K. CONRAD, PRISON KEEPER BRIAN P. STIRLING, SUSAN DUFFY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN BACCUS, a/k/a John Baccus Roosevelt
David Meyers v. Carl Manis
as 20-7262
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER DANIELS, J. ELY, A. W. COMBS and others
Defendant:
JAMES JONES, PAMELA MEADE SARGENT, ROBERT STEWART BALLOU and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Carl Manis
as 20-7246
Defendant / Appellee:
I. O. RIVERO, I. O. HARRIS, J. ELY and others
Defendant:
JULIA C. DUDLEY, PAMELA MEADE SARGENT, ROBERT STEWART BALLOU and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
