Cases 1 - 10 of 15
David Richardson v. Harold Clarke
as 21-6507
Defendant / Appellee:
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HAROLD W. CLARKE, Virginia Dept. of Corrections, TAMMY WILLIAMS, Warden, DRCC Correctional Center and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID A. RICHARDSON
Abdul-Hasib Al-Musawwir v. Harold Clarke
as 21-6459
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of Virginia Dept. of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
ABDUL-HASIB AL-MUSAWWIR
Kenneth Newkirk v. Director
as 21-6078
Respondent / Appellee:
DIRECTOR, Dept. of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Christopher Coleman v. Harold Clarke
as 20-7083
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER COLEMAN
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Dir. Virginia Dept. of Corrections
Alexander Harris v. Harold Clarke
as 20-6950
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, Director of the VA Dept of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALEXANDER HARRIS
David Firewalker-Fields v. Hon. Bruce Albertson
as 20-6884
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH SMITH, Virginia Dept of Corrections District 39, HON. BRUCE ALBERTSON, Page County Circuit Court Judge, KENNETH ALGER, Commonwealth Attorney and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID NIGHTHORSE FIREWALKER-FIELDS
James King, Jr. v. Harold Clarke
as 20-6429
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES DEWEY KING, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of VA Dept. of Corrections
Abdul Mu'Min v. Harold Clarke
as 20-6031
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, Director of Va. Dept. of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
ABDUL MU'MIN, f/k/a Travis J. Marron
Travis Marron v. Harold Clarke
as 19-7872
Petitioner / Appellant:
TRAVIS J. MARRON, a/k/a Abdul Mu'Min
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, Director of VA Dept. of Corrections
Travis Marron v. Harold Clarke
as 19-7721
Petitioner / Appellant:
TRAVIS J. MARRON, a/k/a Abdul Mu'Min
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, Director of VA Dept. of Corrections
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
