Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Scott Sonda v. West Virginia Oil & Gas Conservation Commission
as 22-2271
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SCOTT SONDA and BRIAN CORWIN
Defendant / Appellant:
WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION VIA THE WEST VIRGINIA OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION, RANDALL M. ALBERT, HAROLD WARD, in his official capacity as member of the WV Oil & Gas Conservation Commission and others
Defendant:
PATRICK MORRISEY, in his capacity as Attorney General of the State of West Virginia
DeWayne Baker v. Ivan Gilmore
as 21-2227
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEWAYNE BAKER, a/k/a Dwayne Baker
Defendant / Appellee:
IVAN T. GILMORE, Warden, A. HICKS, Assistant Warden, K. H. TUCKER, Institutional Ombudsman and others
Defendant:
COFFEEWOOD CORRECTIONAL CENTER, T. HARVEY, Regional Ombudsman Central Region, MARCUS M. HODGES, Regional Administrator Central Region and others
Elliot Dickson v. Fidelity and Deposit Company
as 21-1160
Defendant:
FORNEY ENTERPRISES, INC., ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY and COLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY
Defendant / Appellee:
FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELLIOT H. DICKSON, United States of America for the Use and Benefit of, ELLIOT H. DICKSON, P. E. and UNITED STATES EX REL. ELLIOT DICKSON, P. E.
DeWayne Baker v. Ivan Gilmore
as 21-6009
Defendant / Appellee:
STETVEN A. JONES, Captain, SERGEANT T. H. WILLIAMSON, JANE DOE, Medical Contractor Mediko employee and others
Defendant:
MARCUS M. HODGES, Regional Administrator Central Region, COFFEEWOOD CORRECTIONAL CENTER, T. HARVEY, Regional Ombudsman Central Region and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEWAYNE BAKER
Clarence Harris v. City of Virginia Beach
as 20-6737
Defendant / Appellee:
HON. ELIZABETH S. HODGES, an individual, CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, a municipal entity, OFFICER P. E. GREENFIELD, VBPD, an individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLARENCE ELLIOTT HARRIS, as an individual
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
