Real Property Cases filed in Virginia
Cases 91 - 100 of 1,649
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 3.05 Acres of Land, Owned by Ann C. Clements and Mary Arrington Clements We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2022cv00321
Plaintiff: Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant: 3.05 Acres of Land, Owned by Ann C. Clements and Mary Arrington Clements
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 0.09 Acres of Land, Owned by Larry Bernard Cunningham and Carolyn A. Cunningham et al
as 7:2022cv00332
Plaintiff: Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant: 0.09 Acres of Land, Owned by Larry Bernard Cunningham and Carolyn A. Cunningham and 0.26 Acres of Land, Owned by Larry Bernard Cunningham and Carolyn A. Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 0.15 Acres of Land, Owned by Russell R. Barksdale, Jr.
as 7:2022cv00322
Plaintiff: Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant: 0.15 Acres of Land, Owned by Russell R. Barksdale, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 0.21 Acres of Land, Owned by William J. Correll, Sr. and Nadine E. Correll et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2022cv00333
Plaintiff: Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant: 0.21 Acres of Land, Owned by William J. Correll, Sr. and Nadine E. Correll and 0.11 Acres of Land, Owned by William J. Correll, Sr. and Nadine E. Correll
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 0.54 Acres of Land, Owned by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
as 4:2022cv00030
Plaintiff: Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant: 0.54 Acres of Land, Owned by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 0.107 Acres of Land, Owned by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
as 4:2022cv00031
Plaintiff: Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant: 0.107 Acres of Land, Owned by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 1.71 Acres of Land, Owned by David Lee Adams and Teressa H. Adams, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
as 4:2022cv00035
Plaintiff: Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant: 1.71 Acres of Land, Owned by David Lee Adams and Teressa H. Adams, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 5.36 Acres of Land, Owned by Dana H. Sparks, Trustee of the Billie Anne Harmon Living Trust, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
as 4:2022cv00038
Plaintiff: Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant: 5.36 Acres of Land, Owned by Dana H. Sparks, Trustee of the Billie Anne Harmon Living Trust, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 8.74 Acres of Land, Owned by John W. Craddock, Jeffrey E. Craddock, Kathleen Craddock, William Langhorn Craddock, Nancy M. Craddock, E. Keith Stogner, Joan C. Stogner, James R. Craddock, and Ann S. Cr
as 4:2022cv00039
Plaintiff: Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant: 8.74 Acres of Land, Owned by John W. Craddock, Jeffrey E. Craddock, Kathleen Craddock, William Langhorn Craddock, Nancy M. Craddock, E. Keith Stogner, Joan C. Stogner, James R. Craddock, and Ann S. Cr
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 1.77 Acres of Land, Owned by Malcolm Dale Roach, Jr., Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
as 4:2022cv00043
Plaintiff: Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant: 1.77 Acres of Land, Owned by Malcolm Dale Roach, Jr., Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?