Cases 101 - 110 of 1,649
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 3.73 Acres of Land, Owned by Nancy H. Weatherford, John G. Mitchell and Phyllis H. Mitchell, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
as 4:2022cv00066
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
3.73 Acres of Land, Owned by Nancy H. Weatherford, John G. Mitchell and Phyllis H. Mitchell, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 0.663 Acres of Land, Owned by David R. Mehalko, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
as 4:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
0.663 Acres of Land, Owned by David R. Mehalko, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 0.70 Acres of Land, Owned by Donnie W. Haymore, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
as 4:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
0.70 Acres of Land, Owned by Donnie W. Haymore, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 0.335 Acres of Land, Owned by George Lee Jones et al
as 7:2022cv00331
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
0.335 Acres of Land, Owned by George Lee Jones and 2.01 Acres of Land, Owned by George Lee Jones
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 0.54 Acres of Land, Owned by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
as 4:2022cv00030
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
0.54 Acres of Land, Owned by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 0.107 Acres of Land, Owned by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
as 4:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
0.107 Acres of Land, Owned by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 1.71 Acres of Land, Owned by David Lee Adams and Teressa H. Adams, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
as 4:2022cv00035
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
1.71 Acres of Land, Owned by David Lee Adams and Teressa H. Adams, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 5.36 Acres of Land, Owned by Dana H. Sparks, Trustee of the Billie Anne Harmon Living Trust, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
as 4:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
5.36 Acres of Land, Owned by Dana H. Sparks, Trustee of the Billie Anne Harmon Living Trust, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 8.74 Acres of Land, Owned by John W. Craddock, Jeffrey E. Craddock, Kathleen Craddock, William Langhorn Craddock, Nancy M. Craddock, E. Keith Stogner, Joan C. Stogner, James R. Craddock, and Ann S. Cr
as 4:2022cv00039
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
8.74 Acres of Land, Owned by John W. Craddock, Jeffrey E. Craddock, Kathleen Craddock, William Langhorn Craddock, Nancy M. Craddock, E. Keith Stogner, Joan C. Stogner, James R. Craddock, and Ann S. Cr
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 1.77 Acres of Land, Owned by Malcolm Dale Roach, Jr., Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
as 4:2022cv00043
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
1.77 Acres of Land, Owned by Malcolm Dale Roach, Jr., Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
