Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. Easements to Construct, Operate, and Maintain a Natural Gas Pipeline Over Tracts of Land in Giles County, Craig County, Montgomery County, Roanoke County, Franklin County, and Pittsylvania County, Vir et al
as 7:2017cv00492
Defendant:
1.97 Acres of Land, Owned by Keith M. Wilson and Mary K. Wilson, 3.76 Acres of Land, Owned by Catherine Beckner Kingery, 2.05 Acres of Land, Owned by Howard M. Thompson and Christine W. Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Amicus Curiae:
Tammy Belinsky and Daniel Breslau
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 0.15 Acres of Land, Owned by Frank W. Hale and Flossie I. Hale and Robert Matthew Hamm and Aimee Chase Hamm
as 7:2019cv00181
Defendant:
0.15 Acres of Land, Owned by Frank W. Hale and Flossie I. Hale and Robert Matthew Hamm and Aimee Chase Hamm
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC v. 4.93 Acres, More or Less, in Nelson Co. VA, Located on Parcel ID No. 46-3-2A, Described as Parcel "A" in that Plat of Survey by Allen M. Hale, L.S. et al
as 3:2018cv00079
Plaintiff:
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
Nancy Kassam-Adams, Shahir Kassam-Adams and 4.93 Acres, More or Less, in Nelson Co. VA, Located on Parcel ID No. 46-3-2A, Described as Parcel "A" in that Plat of Survey by Allen M. Hale, L.S.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Hale v. CNX Gas Company, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv00059
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Carlos Hale
Defendant:
CNX Gas Company, LLC, Torch Oil & Gas Company, John Does A-Z and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abraham et al v. Total Realty Management, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv00006
Plaintiff:
Steven Abraham, Joseph Alexander, Debra Alexander and others
Defendant:
Total Realty Management, LLC, Mark Dain, Mark Jalajel and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
