Cases 11 - 15 of 15
Alan Metzgar v. KBR, Inc.
as 17-1960
Not Classified By Court:
In re: KBR, INCORPORATED, Burn Pit Litigation
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALAN METZGAR, RWT 09-744, PAUL PARKER, and all others similarly situated: RWT 09-744, JOSHUA ELLER, RWT 09-2748 and others
Charles Dickerson v. TLC The Laser Eye Center
as 12-1117
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES BENJAMIN DICKERSON, a/k/a Ben, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff:
JOHN HOLLMAN, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
TLC THE LASER EYE CENTER INSTITUTE, INC., TLC THE LASER CENTER CAROLINA, INC., TLC THE LASER CENTER MADISON, INC. and others
Mohammed Aziz v. Alcolac, Incorporated
as 10-1908
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOHAMMED AZIZ, MERAN SALIH ABDULLAH, MOSSA ABDULLAH MOSSA and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ALCOLAC, INCORPORATED
Defendant:
REPUBLIC OF IRAQ, a sovereign nation, VWR INTERNATIONAL, LLC, a/k/a VWR International LTD, f/k/a BDH, LTD, THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC, INCORPORATED, f/k/a Oxoid, LTD, a/k/a Oxoid, Incorporated and others
Inez Sanders v. Norfolk Southern Corporation
as 10-1189
Plaintiff - Appellant:
INEZ SANDERS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, DOROTHY NEWSOME, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and GARLAN HARPER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Plaintiff:
JAMES WALL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and RITA HARPER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION, a Virginia Corporation
Defendant - None:
MIKE FORD and JAMES THORNTON
Christy Dalton v. Norfolk Southern Corporation
as 09-2367
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTY T. DALTON
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH R. CUTRIGHT, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, JOHN C. BEVINGTON, JESSICA CURTIS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION
Defendant - None:
JOHN DOES 1-10
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
