Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Grant v. State of Maryland et al
as 8:2023cv00313
Plaintiff:
Jordan Grant
Defendant:
State of Maryland, Prince George's County, Chief of Police Malik Aziz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Terrell et al v. LTF Club Operations Company
as 1:2020cv02193
Plaintiff:
Tiara Terrell and Dominique DeJaun Clarke
Defendant:
LTF Club Operations Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Terrell v. Tribeca Automotive, Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv01985
Plaintiff:
Onita Mae Terrell
Defendant:
Tribeca Automotive, Inc. and Eduard F. Bueno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Terrell v. Tribeca Automotive, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01985
Plaintiff:
Onita Mae Terrell
Defendant:
Tribeca Automotive, Inc. and Eduard F. Bueno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Terrell v. Tribeca Automotive, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01983
Defendant:
Tribeca Automotive, Inc. and Eduard F. Bueno
Plaintiff:
Onita Mae Terrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Terrell v. Tribeca Automotive, Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv01985
Defendant:
Tribeca Automotive, Inc. and Eduard F. Bueno
Plaintiff:
Onita Mae Terrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gray v. Terrell
as 8:2014cv01424
Plaintiff:
Alan Gray
Defendant:
David W. Terrell, Jr. and Keystone Freight Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jones v. The Estate of Roosevelt Stuckey et al
as 1:2012cv01108
Plaintiff:
Terrell Justin Jones
Defendant:
The Estate of Roosevelt Stuckey, Jack Cherry and The Estate of Jack Cherry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Adams v. Good Construction, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv03070
Plaintiff:
Terrell D. Adams
Defendant:
Good Construction, Inc., Kenneth V. Good, Dorsey E. Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson-Speight v. Davis
as 8:2011cv00442
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Anderson-Speight
Defendant:
Terrell Davis
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
