Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Chandler v D.R. Horton, Inc.
as 8:2023cv00982
Plaintiff:
Timothy Arthur Chandler, III
Defendant:
D.R. Horton, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
National Electrical Benefit Fund v. DV Technologies, Inc.
as 8:2010cv01779
Plaintiff:
National Electrical Benefit Fund , Lindell K. Lee and D.R. Borden, Jr.
Defendant:
DV Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Trustees of The National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund et al v. D.R. Peden Fire Protection, Inc.
as 8:2009cv02582
Plaintiff:
Trustees of The National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Local 669 UA Education Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
D.R. Peden Fire Protection, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
National Electrical Benefit Fund et al v. Retrac Electrical Constructions Corp.
as 8:2008cv02456
Plaintiff:
National Electrical Benefit Fund, Lindell K. Lee and D.R. Borden, Jr.
Defendant:
Retrac Electrical Constructions Corp.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
National Electrical Benefit Fund et al v. Power Plus Electric, Inc.
as 8:2008cv00616
Plaintiff:
National Electrical Benefit Fund, Lindell K. Lee and D.R. Borden, Jr.
Defendant:
Power Plus Electric, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
National Electrical Benefit Fund et al v. Bob's Bullet Boring, Inc.
as 8:2008cv00615
Plaintiff:
National Electrical Benefit Fund, Lindell K. Lee, D.R. Borden, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Bob's Bullet Boring, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
National Electrical Benefit Fund et al v. CMK Engineering, Inc.
as 8:2008cv00486
Plaintiff:
National Electrical Benefit Fund, Jon F. Walters and D.R. Borden, Jr.
Defendant:
CMK Engineering, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
