Cases 11 - 19 of 19
North Carolina Utilities Comm v. FERC
as 12-1881
Petitioner:
NORTH CAROLINA UTILITIES COMMISSION
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Tri-County Relicensing Comm v. FERC
as 12-1169
Petitioner:
TRI-COUNTY RELICENSING COMMITTEE
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
:
and
James Lyons v. FERC
as 11-1333
Petitioner:
JAMES LYONS and POLLY LYONS
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Richard Frie v. FERC
as 11-1331
Petitioner:
RICHARD W. FRIE
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Virginia State Corporation Com v. FERC
as 09-2053
Petitioner:
VIRGINIA STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Intervenor - Respondent:
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER COMPANY
Office of the Attorney General v. FERC
as 09-2052
Petitioner:
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Division of Consumer Counsel
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Intervenor - Respondent:
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER COMPANY
Maryland Public Service Commis v. FERC
as 09-1924
Petitioner:
MARYLAND PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION and NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES
Intervenor:
AMERICAN MUNICIPAL POWER, INCORPORATED, AMERICAN PUBLIC POWER ASSOCIATION, MARYLAND OFFICE OF PEOPLE'S COUNSEL and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
:
, , and others
South Carolina Electric & Gas v. FERC
as 08-1276
Petitioner:
SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS COMPANY
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
:
, , and others
Piedmont Environmental Council v. FERC
as 07-1651
Petitioner:
PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL
Intervenor:
PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK (NYPSC), MINNESOTA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Amicus Supporting Petitioner:
STATE OF NEW YORK, STATE OF ARIZONA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
