Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Swails v. AW Chesterton Company et al
as 2:2011cv03329
Plaintiff:
Susan L Swails
Defendant:
AW Chesterton Company , Air and Liquid Systems Corporation , Bayer Cropscience Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Campbell v. AW Chesterton Company et al
as 2:2011cv01340
Plaintiff:
Eulalie D Campbell
Defendant:
AW Chesterton Company , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Bayer Cropscience Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Karst et al v. AW Chesterton Company et al
as 2:2011cv00867
Plaintiff:
Gerald M Karst, Sr and Dorothy Karst
Defendant:
AW Chesterton Company , Air and Liquid Systems Corporation , Bayer Cropscience Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. AW Chesterton Company et al
as 2:2010cv01185
Plaintiff:
William R Johnson
Defendant:
AW Chesterton Company, Bayer Cropscience Inc, CBS Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Willis v. BW IP International Inc et al
as 2:2009cv02163
Plaintiff:
Tina Willis, Tina Willis and Tina Willis
Defendant:
BW IP International Inc, Carrier Corporation, CBS Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Vawter et al v. Alfa Laval Inc et al
as 3:2008cv02426
Plaintiff:
John W Vawter, John W Vawter, Ernestine Vawter and others
Defendant:
Alfa Laval Inc, Anchor Darling Valve Company, Armstrong International Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Duncan et al v. Alfa Laval Inc et al
as 0:2007cv00050
Plaintiff:
Milton Duncan, Milton Duncan, Milton Duncan and others
Defendant:
Alfa Laval Inc, Armstrong International Inc, Aqua-Chem Inc and others
Cross Claimant:
IMO Industries Inc
Cross Defendant:
Aqua-Chem Inc, Aurora Pump Company, Buffalo Pumps Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
