Cases 31 - 40 of 124
Zachary Wallace v. Harold Clarke
as 20-6466
Petitioner / Appellant:
ZACHARY DONTE WALLACE, a/k/a Zachary Dante Wallace
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director Virginia Department of Corrections
Dominique Hackley v. Harold Clarke
as 20-6324
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
DOMINIQUE ALEXANDER HACKLEY
Raymond Fitzgerald v. Harold Clarke
as 20-6309
Petitioner / Appellant:
RAYMOND FITZGERALD
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Robert Smith v. Harold Clarke
as 20-6227
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT F. SMITH
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
John Bellamy, Jr. v. Daniel Calhoun, Jr.
as 20-6195
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, F. SHILLING, Director of Health Services, MS. MINTER, Nurse Practitioner and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN WALTER BELLAMY, JR.
Darryl Jackson v. Harold Clarke
as 20-6139
Petitioner / Appellant:
DARRYL SYLVESTER JACKSON
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Clayton Smith v. Harold Clarke
as 20-6140
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
CLAYTON GEORGE SMITH
Edward Saunders v. Harold Clarke
as 19-7745
Petitioner / Appellant:
EDWARD GERMAINE SAUNDERS
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Jamal Gethers v. Harold Clarke
as 19-7523
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMAL NATHAN GETHERS
Shaquan Fallen v. Harold Clarke
as 19-7440
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
SHAQUAN JAMAR FALLEN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.