Cases 51 - 60 of 106
Nofflet v. Astrue
as 5:2011cv00020
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
Melissa Nofflet
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ellis v. Astrue
as 5:2011cv00008
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
Brenda F. Ellis
Interested Party:
U.S. Attorney Tim Heaphy and SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Gill v. Astrue
as 3:2011cv00085
Plaintiff:
Richard Gill
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Graybill v. Astrue
as 6:2011cv00002
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Graybill
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Beckner v. Astrue
as 7:2011cv00047
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
John E. Beckner
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Waldron v. Astrue
as 7:2010cv00567
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Plaintiff:
David A. Waldron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Reese v. Astrue
as 7:2010cv00538
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
David Lee Reese
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Latchum v. Astrue
as 4:2010cv00050
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
Debra A. Latchum
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Crist v. Astrue
as 5:2010cv00106
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
Susan G. Crist
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lucas v. Astrue
as 6:2010cv00049
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
Linda H. Lucas
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
