Cases 61 - 70 of 172
Ghaisar et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2018cv00954
Plaintiff:
Kelara Ghaisar, Negeen Ghaisar and James Ghaisar
Defendant:
John Does 1-10 and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Dixon v. Nationstar Mortgage et al
as 1:2018cv00666
Plaintiff:
Merrick L. Dixon
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and John and Jane Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Brown-El v. Seterus, Inc., et al et al
as 2:2018cv00268
Plaintiff:
Dawne Brown-El
Defendant:
Seterus, Inc., et al, The Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) et al, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. aka ("MERS") et al and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2601
Quatrone v. Gannett Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00325
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Quatrone
Defendant:
Gannett Co., Inc. , The Gannett Benefit Plans Committee and John/Jane Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Piccone v. Iancu et al
as 1:2018cv00307
Petitioner:
Louis A. Piccone
Defendant:
Andrei Iancu, William Covey, John and Jane Doe 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Overstock.com, Inc. v. Visocky et al
as 1:2017cv01331
Plaintiff:
Overstock.com, Inc.
Defendant:
Viktor Visocky, Otto Srams, www.hilltopstock.com and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Canada Goose Inc. v. Registrant of Canadian Goose.Com et al
as 1:2017cv00903
Plaintiff:
Canada Goose Inc.
Defendant:
Registrant of Canadian Goose.Com and John Does (1-10)
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
LHF Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-10
as 3:2016cv00748
Plaintiff:
LHF Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
