Cases 61 - 64 of 64
United States ex rel. Mark Rad v. Purdue Pharma L.P.
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 09-1202
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES EX REL. MARK RADCLIFFE
Defendant - Appellee:
PURDUE PHARMA L.P. and PURDUE PHARMA, INCORPORATED
Amicus Curiae:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
:
, , and others
Rory Mayberry v. Michael Battles
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 08-2191
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RORY MAYBERRY, United States ex rel. and ROBERT ISAKSON, United States ex rel.
Party-in-Interest - None:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL BATTLES, SECURITY VENTURES INTERNATIONAL, LIMITED, DANUBIA GLOBAL, INCORPORATED and others
Defendant - None:
EMERGENT BUSINESS SERVICES, TARHEEL TRAINING, LLC, ROB ROY TRUMBLE and others
Debtor - Appellee:
CUSTER BATTLES, LLC
United States ex rel. Peter C. v. Bald Head Island Limited
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 08-2012
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel. Peter C. Curnin and UNITED STATES EX REL. PETER C. CURNIN
Defendant - Appellee:
BALD HEAD ISLAND LIMITED, a Texas limited partnership, MARK D. MITCHELL, general partner and MICHAEL K. MITCHELL, general partner
:
U.S. ex rel. Godfrey v. KBR, Incorporated
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 08-1423
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel. Barrington T. Godfrey and UNITED STATES EX REL. BARRINGTON T. GODFREY
Defendant - Appellee:
KBR, INCORPORATED and KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT SERVICES, INCORPORATED
Defendant - None:
JAMAL NASERY, ABC INTERNATIONAL GROUP, GULF CATERING COMPANY and others
:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.