Cases 41 - 50 of 366
Fountain v. BP Expl & Prod
as 22-30725
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John Earl Fountain
Defendant / Appellee:
BP Exploration & Production, Incorporated, BP America Production Company, BP, P.L.C. and others
Kirby Inland Marine, LP v. Sanchez
as 22-20594
Petitioner:
Kirby Inland Marine, L.P., Owner of M/V Sabinal
Claimant:
Daniel Sanchez, David Hayes and Michael Randolph
Brown v. BP Expl & Prod
as 22-30671
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Reynard Lenderis Brown
Defendant / Appellee:
BP Exploration & Production, Incorporated, BP America Production Company, BP, P.L.C. and others
Byrd v. BP Expl & Prod
as 22-30654
Plaintiff / Appellant:
George Arron Byrd
Defendant / Appellee:
BP Exploration & Production, Incorporated, BP America Production Company, BP, P.L.C. and others
Beverly v. BP Expl & Prod
as 22-30665
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joy Lashawn Beverly
Defendant / Appellee:
BP Exploration & Production, Incorporated, BP America Production Company, BP, P.L.C. and others
Diamond Services v. Cormier
as 22-30688
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Diamond Services Corporation, as Owner of The Diamond 85
Defendant / Appellant:
Benjamin D. Cormier
Defendant / Appellee:
Crosby Tugs, L.L.C. and Crosby Marine Transportation, L.L.C.
Norwood v. BP America Production
as 22-30631
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Austin Norwood
Defendant / Appellee:
BP America Production Company, BP Exploration & Production, Incorporated, BP, P.L.C. and others
Ingram Barge v. Ratcliff
as 22-30577
Petitioner:
Ingram Barge Company, L.L.C., as owner and operator of Barge IB976, doing business as Ingram Barge Company
Claimant:
Gregory Ratcliff
Pontchartrain Partners v. Z.E. Svcs
as 22-30420
Defendant / Appellant:
Pontchartrain Partners, L.L.C.
Defendant / Appellee:
Z.E. Services, L.L.C.
Gonzalez v. BP Expl & Prod
as 22-30542
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Hector Gonzalez
Defendant / Appellee:
BP Exploration & Production, Incorporated, BP America Production Company, BP, P.L.C. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
