Cases 1 - 10 of 1,316
In re: Salvador Jimenez, III
as 24-10700
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Petitioner:
In re: Salvador Jimenez, III
Arthur BurtonIn re: Arthur Burton
as 24-20340
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Petitioner:
In re: Arthur Lee Burton
Castro v. Lumpkin
as 24-50562
Petitioner:
Bart Gonzales Castro
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Rodney Reed
as 24-50529
Petitioner:
In re: Rodney Reed
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
In re: Ivan Cantu
as 24-40110
Petitioner:
In re: Ivan Abner Cantu
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
In re: Juan Albarado
as 23-10602
Petitioner:
In re: Juan Manuel Albarado
Respondent:
Bryan Collier, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice and Jeneffer Cozby, Warden
LumpkinIn re: Lumpkin
as 23-20169
Petitioner:
In re: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Respondent:
Carlos Manuel Ayestas, also known as Dennis Zelaya Corea
Arthur Brown, Jr.In re: Arthur Brown, Jr.
as 23-20080
Petitioner:
In re: Arthur Brown, Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Richard VasquezIn re: Richard Vasquez
as 23-40079
Petitioner:
In re: Richard Vasquez
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Wesley RuizIn re: Wesley Ruiz
as 23-10092
Petitioner:
In re: Wesley Lynn Ruiz
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
