Cases 21 - 30 of 148
Anthony Montgomery v. Ralph Walton, Jr., et al
as 17-11268
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY MONTGOMERY
Defendant - Appellee:
RALPH WALTON, JR., DAVID SUTHERLAND, BRUCE ESPIN and others
Richard Barroso v. State of Texas, et al
as 17-40922
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD BARROSO
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TEXAS, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, TEXAS BOARD OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE and others
Ronnie Jordan v. Union County Sheriff Dept, et al
as 17-60590
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONNIE D. JORDAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JIMMY EDWARDS, Sheriff, JOHNNY BELL, Jail Administrator, MICHAEL CORTEZ PAGE, Assistant Jail Administrator and others
Jason McBride v. Mark Reynolds, et al
as 17-50601
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON WAYNE MCBRIDE
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK REYNOLDS, Sheriff, Comal County Sheriff's Office #304, BRENT PALLUS, Chief, Comal County Sheriff's Office, JOHN BELL, Major, Comal County Sheriff's Office #302 and others
USA v. Bernard Bell, Jr.
as 17-60475
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
BERNARD MILFORD BELL, JR.
James McCoy v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-10694
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES BELL MCCOY
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
John Bell v. A. Allemand, et al
as 17-30169
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN PAUL BELL
Defendant - Appellee:
A. ALLEMAND and JERRY BRISTER
Cleveland Bell v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
as 17-30035
Petitioner - Appellant:
CLEVELAND BELL
Respondent - Appellee:
DARREL VANNOY, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
USA v. Rodney Bell
as 17-10010
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RODNEY BELL, also known as "Black"
Jeffrey Haufler v. William Stephens, et al
as 16-41628
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY HAUFLER
Defendant - Appellee:
EDGAR BAKER, VANCE DRUM, OLIVER BELL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
