Cases 31 - 40 of 90
Esquiel Diaz v. USA, et al
as 12-50901
Petitioner - Appellant:
ESQUIEL MONDRAGO DIAZ
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WARDEN, RCDC III, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Dimas Murillo-Mosquera v. USA, et al
as 12-50902
Petitioner - Appellant:
DIMAS MURILLO-MOSQUERA
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WARDEN, RCDC III, BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Jeronimo Espericuueta v. USA, et al
as 12-50899
Petitioner - Appellant:
JERONIMO ESPERICUUETA
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WARDEN, REEVES COUNTY DETENTION CENTER III, BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Ruben Campos v. USA, et al
as 12-50898
Petitioner - Appellant:
RUBEN ARROLLO CAMPOS
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WARDEN, RCDC III, BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Ruben Gonzalez v. USA, et al
as 12-50888
Petitioner - Appellant:
RUBEN OLIVARES GONZALEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BUREAU OF PRISONS, GEO GROUP and others
Rogelio Hernandez v. USA, et al
as 12-50892
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROGELIO ROQUE HERNANDEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WARDEN, REEVES COUNTY DETENTION CENTER III, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Leonid Demine v. USA, et al
as 12-50866
Petitioner - Appellant:
LEONID DEMINE
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BUREAU OF PRISONS, GEO GROUP and others
Luis Orozco v. USA, et al
as 12-50868
Petitioner - Appellant:
LUIS ALVARO OROZCO
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Hamis Chande v. United States Attorney General, et al
as 12-50832
Petitioner - Appellant:
HAMIS ATHOMAN CHANDE
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Kenneth Counce v. United States Attorney General
as 12-10805
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENNETH IRVIN COUNCE
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
