Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Cases 61 - 70 of 689
Adams v. Lumpkin
as 24-20106
Petitioner: Alex Adams
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Adams v. Lumpkin
as 24-20110
Petitioner: Alex Adams
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, re
Greer v. Lumpkin
as 24-50186
Petitioner: Otis Greer
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Thomas v. Linthicum
as 24-40165
Plaintiff: Jewell Thomas
Defendant: Lanette Linthicum, Isaac Kwarteng, Jerry Sanchez and others
McCray v. Lumpkin
as 24-50159
Plaintiff: Endicott McCray
Defendant: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Baker v. Lumpkin
as 24-50153
Petitioner: Stanley Foster Baker
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Smith v. FCI Texarkana Warden
as 24-40142
Petitioner: Curtis Smith
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and FCI Texarkana Warden
Hammond v. Lumpkin
as 24-10181
Petitioner: James Bradley Hammond
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Gibson v. Lumpkin
as 24-10184
Petitioner: Scottie H. Gibson
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, r, State of Texas 413th Judicial District of Johnson County, State of Texas 249th Judicial District Court of Johnson County and others
Roy v. Lumpkin
as 24-40116
Petitioner: Alex Joseph Roy
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?