Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Adams v. Lumpkin
as 24-20106
Petitioner:
Alex Adams
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Adams v. Lumpkin
as 24-20110
Petitioner:
Alex Adams
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, re
Adams v. USPS
as 23-40456
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alex Adams
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Postal Service, Law Library McConnell Unit, Central Grievance Office and others
Adams v. Lumpkin
as 23-20325
Petitioner / Appellant:
Alex Adams
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Adams v. Lumpkin
as 23-40352
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alex Adams
Defendant / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Warden Gracia, Board of Pardons and Paroles and others
Adams v. Lumpkin
as 23-20265
Petitioner / Appellant:
Alex Adams
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Adams v. USPS
as 23-20177
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alex Adams
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Postal Service, Law Library McConnell Unit, Central Grievance Office and others
Adams v. Unknown Layton
as 23-40234
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alex Adams
Defendant / Appellee:
Unknown Layton, Sargeant, Coffield Unit, Use of Force Office, Coffield Unit, University of Texas Medical Branch, McConnell Unit and others
Adams v. Central Grievance Office
as 23-40235
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alex Adams
Defendant / Appellee:
Central Grievance Office and Inspector General Mike Ptasienski
Adams v. Shelby
as 23-20108
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alex Adams
Defendant / Appellee:
Tammy Shelby, Central Grievance Office, Michael Carvajal, Federal Bureau of Prisons Director, Mike Piasiensk, Inspector General and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
