Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Blanchette v. Ward
as 23-10592
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Blair A. Blanchette
Defendant / Appellee:
Ingrid Ward, FSM Major, Francis Grace, NP, Tammy Nauit, FSM III and others
USA v. Robert Jensen, Jr.
as 16-11364
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT ROYCE JENSEN, JR.
Courtney Royal v. Dawn Grounds, et al
as 11-51224
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COURTNEY ROYAL, Vampsh Black Sheep League of Doom Gardamun Family Circle Master Vampire High Priest
Defendant - Appellee:
DAWN GROUNDS, Warden, Alfred D. Hughes Unit, CHARLES GRIFFIN, JR., Chaplain, Alfred D. Hughes Unit, ELLIS E. HUTCHISON, Chaplain, Alfred D. Hughes Unit and others
Peter Jensen v. Warden Staples, et al
as 10-20641
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER J JENSEN
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN STAPLES, MAJOR RICE and TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE PRISON SYSTEM
USA v. Uwe Jensen
as 10-20572
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
UWE JENSEN
USA v. Uwe Jensen
as 10-20339
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
UWE JENSEN
USA v. Uwe Jensen
as 10-20292
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
UWE JENSEN
USA v. Uwe Jensen
as 10-20271
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
UWE JENSEN
Greg Jensen v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 09-40306
Petitioner - Appellant:
GREG JENSEN
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION and RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Jensen v. Quarterman, et al
as 08-20605
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER J JENSEN
Defendant - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, C S STAPLES and B MCFARLAND, Mailroom Supervisor
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
