Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Williams v. Lumpkin
as 22-10278
Petitioner / Appellant:
Michael Williams
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Davis v. Henderson
as 22-20035
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael William Davis
Defendant / Appellee:
Sheriff Rand Henderson, Magistrate Paul Damico, Officer Rose and others
Davis v. Maginnis
as 22-20011
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael William Davis, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Patty Maginnis, Judge, Adam McLane, District Attorney, Sophia Korndorffer, Attorney and others
USA v. Michael Gardner
as 15-60743
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL WILLIAM GARDNER
Michael Williams v. Burl Cain, Warden
as 15-30662
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
BURL CAIN, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
Michael Burkett, Jr. v. Ralph Bale
as 12-40044
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL WILLIAM BURKETT, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
RALPH BALES, In His Offical Capacity as PREA Ombusman
Michael Burkett, Jr. v. Bruce Zeller, et al
as 10-10171
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL WILLIAM BURKETT, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
BRUCE ZELLER, Senior Warden, JOE GRIMES, Assistant Warden, MARY HOLLIGAN, Chief of Classification and others
Michael Williams v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 10-40164
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Michael Williams v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 09-20747
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Williams v. Quarterman
as 06-20914
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
