Cases 11 - 20 of 84
Wallace v. Lumpkin
as 21-11050
Petitioner / Appellant:
Timothy Randolph Wallace
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
USA v. Randolph
as 21-50809
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Danielle Elyce Randolph
Randolph v. E Baton Rouge Prsh Sch Sys
as 21-30022
Defendant / Appellee:
East Baton Rouge Parish School System
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kathran Randolph
Randolph Armstead v. Keith Deville, Warden
as 20-30642
Respondent / Appellee:
Keith Deville, Warden, Winn Correctional Center
Petitioner / Appellant:
Randolph Armstead
Bobby Robinson v. United States Air Force, et al
as 20-50079
Defendant / Appellee:
TINKER AIR FORCE BASE, (Oklahoma, OK), OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Washington, DC, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, DC, Employee Compensation Appeals Board and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BOBBY JOE ROBINSON
Randolph Mach v. OneMain Financial Svc, Inc.
as 19-51048
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDOLPH MACH
Defendant / Appellee:
ONEMAIN FINANCIAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED
Yevgenia Shockome, et al v. Robert Brendel, et al
as 19-50629
Defendant / Appellee:
KYLE COWAND, an individual, MARY F. IVERSON, an individual, STRATOS APOSTOLOU, an individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
V. A., Minor through parent, YEVGENIA SHOCKOME, (Genia) and E. A., Minor through parent
USA v. Darnell Collier
as 19-10392
Defendant / Appellant:
DARNELL RANDOLPH COLLIER
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Bildrick Jackson v. Michael Randolph, et al
as 18-60562
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILDRICK JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL K. RANDOLPH, Mississippi Supreme Court Justice, JAMES W. KITCHENS, Mississippi Supreme Court Justice and JAMES D. MAXWELL, Associate Mississippi Supreme Court Justice
Timothy Wallace v. Ken Paxton, et al
as 18-20445
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY RANDOLPH WALLACE
Defendant - Appellee:
KEN PAXTON, BRAD LIVINGSTON, LEON GUINN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
