Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Wilborn Brumit, Jr. v. Janay Williams, et al
as 10-10494
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILBORN BRUMIT, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
JANAY B WILLIAMS, Property Officer, CHRISTINA MELTON CRAIN, Chairman, Texas Criminal Justice Board, BRAD LIVINGSTON, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice and others
Robbie Newby v. Tony Pate, et al
as 10-10356
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBBIE LYNN NEWBY
Defendant - Appellee:
TONY PATE, Law Library Supervisor, EDDIE WILLIAMS, Warden, KELLI WARD, Grievance, Texas Department of Crimal Justice and others
Robert Tuft v. State of Texas, et al
as 10-20136
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT A TUFT
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TEXAS, BRENDA CHANEY, former Warden of Jester 3 Unit, KATHREN GONZALES, Lieutenant of Correctional Office at the Jester 3 Unit and others
Frank Gaydos v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 09-40479
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK L GAYDOS
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, REYNALDO CASTRO, KELVIN SCOTT and others
Jackson v. English, et al
as 09-40157
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MCCLAIRY JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
FREDDIE M ENGLISH, Property Officer, NATRENIA HICKS, JOE N ROSS, Property Officer and others
McGary v. Morales, et al
as 08-51291
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRARD MCGARY
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL MORALES, Senior Warden, KENNETH R BRIGHT, JR., CAROL E MONROE, JR. and others
Lucky v. Ward, et al
as 08-41091
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOBBY LUCKY
Defendant - Appellee:
KELLI WARD, RICHARD A TRINCI, JR., CHUMA ANADUAKA and others
Melancon v. Ward
as 08-30950
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT MELANCON
Respondent - Appellee:
KELLY WARD, Warden
Melancon v. Ward
as 08-30951
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT MELANCON
Respondent - Appellee:
KELLY WARD, Warden
Thomas v. Owens, et al
as 08-20299
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES SCOT THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
ED OWENS, JAY T MORGAN, ERNEST H GUTIERREZ, JR. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
