Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Hewitt v. Helix Engy Solutions Grp We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-20023
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL J. HEWITT
Defendant / Appellee: HELIX WELL OPS, INCORPORATED and HELIX ENERGY SOLUTIONS GROUP, INCORPORATED
Amicus Curiae: Independent Petroleum Association of America, State of Mississippi, Offshore Operators Committee and others
State of Texas v. USA Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-10011
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF TENNESSEE, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF CONNECTICUT, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Defendant / Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Intervenor: STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF IOWA, UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF OHIO, 483 FEDERALLY RECOGNIZED TRIBAL NATIONS, ILYA SOMIN and others
Not Classified By Court: FOUNDATION FOR MORAL LAW
State of Nevada, et al v. U.S. Department of Labor, et al
as 17-41130
Plaintiff - Appellee: STATE OF NEVADA, STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Defendant - Appellant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, WAGE AND HOUR DIVISION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, MARY ZIEGLER, in her official capacity as Assistant Administrator for Policy of the Wage and Hour Division and others
Movant - Appellant: TEXAS AFL-CIO
Natl Federation of Indep Bus, et al v. Thomas Perez, Secretary, et al
as 17-10054
Plaintiff - Appellee: NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS, TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF BUSINESS, LUBBOCK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE and others
Intervenor Plaintiff - Appellee: STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Intervenor Defendant - Appellee: STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Defendant - Appellant: THOMAS E. PEREZ, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, ANDREW D. AUERBACH and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
State of Nevada, et al v. LABR, et al
as 16-41606
Plaintiff - Appellee: STATE OF NEVADA, STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Defendant - Appellant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, THOMAS E. PEREZ, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, In his official capacity as United States Secretary of Labor, WAGE AND HOUR DIVISION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and others
State of Texas, et al v. USA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-11534
Plaintiff - Appellee: STATE OF TEXAS, HARROLD INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT (TX), STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Defendant - Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, JOHN B. KING, in his Official Capacity as United States Secretary of Education and others
Movant - Appellant: RACHEL JONA TUDOR, Dr.
In re: USA, et al
as 16-40795
Petitioner: In re: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, R. GIL KERLIKOWSKE, Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and others
Respondent: STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
State of Texas, et al v. USA, et al
as 16-40796
Plaintiff - Appellee: STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, R. GIL KERLIKOWSKE, Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and others
Intervenor - Appellant: JANE DOE #1, JANE DOE #2 and JANE DOE #3
In re: USA, et al
as 15-41070
Petitioner: In re: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, R. GIL KERLIKOWSKE, Commissioner of the United States Customs and Border Protection and others
Respondent: STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
State of Texas, et al v. USA, et al
as 15-40702
Plaintiff - Appellee: STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Movant - Appellant: MITCHELL WILLIAMS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?