Cases 41 - 50 of 132
Sandra Dorrell, et al v. Proskauer Rose, L.L.P.
as 17-11313
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SANDRA DORRELL and PHILLIP A. WILKINSON, Individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
PROSKAUER ROSE, L.L.P.
Jesse Rose v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-50334
Petitioner - Appellant:
JESSE RAY ROSE
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
PBBM-Rose Hill, Limited, et al v. CIR
as 17-60276
Petitioner - Appellant:
PBBM-ROSE HILL, LIMITED and PBBM CORPORATION, Tax Matters Partner
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
USA v. Fredrick Rose
as 17-50063
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FREDRICK ROSE
Joseph Robertson, et al v. Chevron USA, Incorporated, et al
as 17-90001
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
JOSEPH ROBERTSON, LARRY HANKTON, SHARVONNE JOHNSON and others
Defendant - Respondent:
CHEVRON USA, INCORPORATED, individually and as the successor corporation of Gulf Oil Exploration & Production, Company, BP EXPLORATION & OIL, INCORPORATED, and/or BP Products North America, Incorporated and/or Amoco Oil Company, CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY and others
Granville Rose v. Camille Buras, et al
as 16-31171
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GRANVILLE ROSE
Defendant - Appellee:
CAMILLE BURAS, EDDIE JORDAN, AUTHER MOREL and others
USA v. Carvorsia Rose
as 16-51076
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CARVORSIA ROSE
Rodolfo Garcia v. TDCJ Boyd Unit, et al
as 16-50655
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODOLFO GARCIA
Defendant - Appellee:
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION BOYD UNIT, CYNTHIA TILLEY, Warden, LARRY L. ROSE, Sergeant of C.O. and others
USA v. Casey Rose
as 16-10608
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CASEY ROSE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
