Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Favela v. Collier
as 22-40415
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Raul Gerardo Favela, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Bryan Collier, Individually, William Stephens, Individually, Brad Livingston, Individually and others
Michael Morgan v. Erica Swicegood, et al
as 19-50684
Defendant / Appellee:
L. HENSON, Nurse, Lasalle Corrections, Jack Harwell Dentention Center, T. CHUDEJ, Nurse, Lasalle Corrections, Jack Harwell Dentention Center, RONDA STONE, Assistant of Administration#killingit, Lasalle Corrections, Jack Harwell Dentention Center and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL EUGENE MORGAN
Charles Raby v. Paul Tolly, et al
as 19-40222
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES DOUGLAS RABY
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD ALFORD, VIRGIL MCMULLEN, TERRY VALENTINE and others
Floyd Hall v. C. Daigle, et al
as 18-20551
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FLOYD WILLIAM HALL
Defendant - Appellee:
C. S. DAIGLE, BRIAN S. SMITH, KELLY STRONG and others
James Murphy v. Richard Alford, et al
as 15-41287
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES D. MURPHY
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD ALFORD, individually and in his official capacity as Warden, Mark Stiles Unit, DIANA THORNTON, individually and in her official capacity as an R.N. at the Mark Stiles Unit, DAVID PILLE, individually and in his official capacity as Grievance Investigator, Mark Stiles Unit and others
Kennith Thomas v. Richard Alford, et al
as 12-41285
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNITH WAYNE THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
INA BROUSSARD, Mailroom Supervisor, DAVID G. PILLE, Law Librarian Secretary and RICHARD ALFORD
Kennith Thomas v. Richard Alford, et al
as 12-40334
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENNITH WAYNE THOMAS
Respondent - Appellee:
RICHARD ALFORD, Senior Warden and RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Antone v. Preschel, et al
as 08-40135
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEROME KEITH ANTONE
Defendant - Appellee:
TIMOTHY M PRESCHEL, ASHLEY HADNOT, COIII, LEROY J BAILEY, JR., Captain and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
